Amputee mobility predictor
Author: c | 2025-04-25
Page 2 and 3: 614 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 4 and 5: 616 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 6 and 7: 618 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 8 and 9: 620 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 622 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 624 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 626 AMPUTEE MOBILITY
AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR - clarkpo.com
82 patients with lower limb loss compared the predictive ability of the AMPnoPRO to a single limb balance test, and the Lower-Extremity Motor Coordination Test. They measured outcome with the TUG, the 2-min Walking Test, and K levels. The AMPnoPRO was found to be the best statistical predictor for mobility outcome with a prosthesis. Further research is needed as this was a small sample size. [5]Reliability[edit | edit source]Gailey et al tested the intra and inter-rater reliability of the AMP with and without a prosthesis using Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). The inter-rater score demonstrated excellent reliability (.99) for the AMPPRO and the AMPnoPRO. Test-retest intra-rater reliability also had excellent reliability, with rater 1 and rater 2 ICC scores of .96 and .98, respectively, for the AMPPRO. ICC scores for the AMPnoPRO were .97 and .86, respectively, for rater 1 and rater 2.[2]Resources:[edit | edit source]-Amputee mobility predictor-Predictor, A. M., Index, L. C., Group, S. I., Medicine, A., Index, R. M., Index, T. B., … Classification, I. (2005). Lower Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures : A Review of the Literature 1995 to 2005 Elizabeth Condie , Grad Dip Phys , FCSP , Helen Scott , Grad Dip Phys , MCSP , and Shaun Treweek , BSc , PhD American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists Lower Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures : A Review of the Literature 1995 to 2005.-Kaluf, B. (2014). Evaluation of Mobility in Persons with Limb Loss Using the Amputee Mobility Predictor and the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Y Mobility Subscale: A Six-Month Retrospective Chart Review, 26(2).References[edit | edit source]↑ Côté-Martin ME, Tremblay A, Couture M, Roy J-S. Translation, reliability, and validity of the French version of the Amputee Mobility Predictor. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2020;32(2):101-6.↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Gailey, R. S., Roach, K. E., Applegate, E. B., Cho, B., Cunniffe, B., Licht, S., … Cho, B. (2002). The Amputee Mobility Predictor : An Instrument to Assess Determinants of the Lower-Limb Amputee ’ s Ability to Ambulate, 83(May). Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Ganyard H, Knapp-Wood J, McDonough K, Palmisano T. Amputee mobility predictor-bilateral: a performance-based measure of mobility for people with bilateral lower-limb loss. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2013 Nov 1;50(7). ↑ Mission Gait. Amputee Mobility Predictor - Setup and Instruction. Sep 2019. Available from: Spaan MH, Vrieling AH, van de Berg P, Dijkstra PU, van Keeken HG. Predicting mobility outcome in lower limb amputees with motor ability tests used in early rehabilitation. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2017 Apr;41(2):171-7.
AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR - howardrehabcenter.com
Where he was walking while wearing other prosthetics before the Linx, but he doesn't have to do that now. Understanding Prosthetics Whether you are helping a new amputee or somebody who has been an amputee for awhile, prosthetic technology can be overwhelming. We explain some of the technology behind today’s prosthetics and how Blatchford uses the natural working of the human body to influence the design of our products. The Blatchford Community For over 130 years Blatchford has designed and produced some of the world's most advanced artificial limbs and mobility solutions. Learn more about resources available to help you and/or the amputee in your life! Become an Ambassador of Mobility! Our Ambassadors are current amputees and caregivers who are busy telling their stories and helping others in their community. They are raising public awareness around limb loss and care about making a positive difference in people's lives.They are inspirational, motivational and unstoppable positive forces in the lower limb amputee community!Please consider joining our Ambassadors of Mobility! We'd love to have you share your experience as a caregiver in the amputee community! IntroducingLinx Fully integrated, microprocessor controlled lower limb system for above knee amputees.Key Features• Situational Awareness - Integrated sensors continuously collect data to seamlessly adapt the limb’s response.• Varying levels of stance resistance to optimise safety at all times: - Standing support - Supported sitting - Controlled stance support - Stumble recovery - Dynamic stair descent - Dynamic slope descent• Cycling Mode and Fixed Angle Flexion Lock Mode• Knee Flexion to 130°• Intuitive Programming Software via PC or App• Up to 3 days battery life• Sandal Toe Foot ShellThe Amputee Mobility Predictor: An Instrument to Assess
Player performance metrics to team formations and even psychological factors like team morale. Additionally, the predictor’s adaptability to new data and its ability to update predictions in real-time are critical for capturing the dynamic nature of the tournament. Lastly, the user interface and accessibility of the predictor should be user-friendly, allowing fans and analysts alike to interact with the AI and understand its forecasts.5 Best AI World Cup Predictor (Free and Paid)1. World Cup AI predictorThe World Cup AI predictor is a cutting-edge AI world cup predictor that leverages the power of artificial intelligence to predict match outcomes at the World Cup. This innovative tool is designed to provide football enthusiasts with a unique perspective on the possible outcomes of the world’s most popular sporting event. It’s not just about predicting winners and losers; it’s about providing a comprehensive analysis of each match, giving users a deeper understanding of the game.What does World Cup AI predictor do?The World Cup AI predictor is more than just a prediction tool. It uses advanced AI algorithms to analyze a multitude of factors that could influence the outcome of a match. These factors include team performance history, player statistics, and current form, among others. The application then uses this data to predict which teams will advance from the group stage to the Round of 16 and ultimately, who has the highest chance of winning the World Cup. It allows users to compare their own predictions with the AI’s, adding an extra layer of excitement to the World Cup experience.World Cup AI predictor Key FeaturesPredictive Analysis: The World Cup AI predictor uses advanced AI algorithms to predict the outcomes of World Cup matches. It considers a multitude of factors, providing a comprehensive analysis of each match.User-Friendly Interface: The application boasts a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and understand predictions.Comparison Feature: Users can compare their own predictions with the AI’s, adding an extra layer of excitement to the World Cup experience.Data Safety: The World Cup AI predictor ensures the safety of user data, adhering to strict privacy policies.Regular Updates: The application is regularly updated to ensure the accuracy of predictions and to provide users with the latest information.Free to Use: The World Cup AI predictor is free to use, making it accessible to all football fans.World Cup AI predictor Pricing PlansThe World Cup AI predictor is offered for free.2. AI World. Page 2 and 3: 614 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 4 and 5: 616 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 6 and 7: 618 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 8 and 9: 620 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 622 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 624 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 626 AMPUTEE MOBILITY Page 2 and 3: 614 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 4 and 5: 616 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 6 and 7: 618 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 8 and 9: 620 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 622 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 624 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai;The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess
Objective[edit | edit source]Amputee mobility predictor (AMP) is a quick and easily administered assessment tool designed to measure the functional status of lower-limb amputees with (AMPPRO) and without (AMPnoPRO) the use of a prosthesis.The test was also designed to be clinically feasible in that it takes less than 10 to 15 minutes to administer and requires very little equipment.AMP can be used before prosthetic fitting to predict functional mobility after prosthetic fitting.[1] Although the AMP can be administered both with (AMPPRO) and without (AMPnoPRO) a prosthesis, the AMPnoPRO has the greatest potential to assist in prosthetic prescription.The AMP was also designed to assess the specific tasks identified in the 5-level Medicare functional classification system (MFCL). MFCL was developed in 1995 by the US Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) to describe the functional abilities of persons who had undergone lower-limb amputation. (K0, K1, K2, K3, K4)[2]K-Level 0Does not have the ability or potential to ambulate or transfer safely with or without assistance, and a prosthesis does not enhance quality of life or mobility.K-Level 1Has the ability or potential to use a prosthesis for transfers or ambulation in level surfaces at a fixed cadence. Typical of the limited and unlimited household ambulatorK-Level 2Has the ability or potential for ambulation with the ability to transverse low-level environmental barriers such as curbs, stairs, or uneven surfaces. Typical of the limited community ambulator.K-Level 3Has the ability or potential for ambulation with variable cadence. Typical of the community ambulator who has the ability to transverse most environmental barriers and may have vocational, therapeutic, or exercise activity that demands prosthetic use beyond simple locomotion.K-Level 4Has the ability or potential for prosthetic ambulation that exceeds basic ambulation skills, exhibiting high impact, stress, or energy levels. Typical of the prosthetic demands of the child, active adult, or athlete.Intended Population[edit | edit source]Unilateral or Bilateral Lower limb amputees. However, bilateral amputee subjects with amputation levels higher than trans-tarsal foot amputations may be tested only with the AMPPRO because it is not physically possible for them to perform the AMPnoPRO.[2] However, an AMP-Bilat was developed that adapted the scoring for people with bilateral limb loss. These changes included not deducting points for using hands to rise from a chair or immediate balance in standing. In the AMPPRO people with bilateral limb loss will score lower and thus show a lower potential for ambulation, these factors are taken into consideration in the AMP-Bilat. [3] Example of the AMP-Bilat Form.Methods of Use[edit | edit source]The total score range for the AMP is 0 to 42 points. In its AMPnoPRO configuration, the highest possible score is 38 points because item 8, single-limb standing, is eliminated (standing on the prosthetic side is impossible). By usingThe Amputee Mobility Predictor: An instrument to assess
An assistive device, the subjects’ potential total score possibilities increase by 5 points (to 43 and 47 points for the AMPnoPRO and AMPRO, respectively), depending on the type of assistive device used during testing.Most AMP items offer 3 scoring choices: 0 indicates inability to perform the task, 1 implies minimal level of achievement or that some assistance was required in completing the task, and 2 denotes complete independence or mastery of the task The items are organized with an increasing level of difficulty to allow for the progressive assessment of the amputee.Items 1 and 2 test the ability to maintain sitting balance. The sitting reach test assesses the ability to displace one’s center of mass (COM) and to return to balanced sitting without falling. If the amputee subject does not have the ability to sit and reach in sitting independently, then the possibility for even limited prosthetic use is remote and the amputee subject therefore would be classed as a level K0.Items 3 through 7 are designed to examine the amputee subject’s ability to maintain balance while performing the relatively simple task of transferring from chair to chair and standing unchallenged. These skills are necessary for a level 1 amputee subject who would receive a prosthesis for transfers and simple standing activities. The ability to perform these test items safely would probably suggest that the patient could manage a prosthesis in limited situations, especially in a supervised environment.Items 8 through 13 are more challenging activities related to standing balance. Subject performs several tests including; single-limb balance, modified standing reach test, nudge test, and check reactive balance. In order to maintain balance during these tests subject requires adequate somatosensory and vestibular systems. Succeeding these tests means that the amputee subject has the potential to be a safe household ambulator; that is, he/she can function at level K2AMP items 14 through 20 evaluate the quality of gait and the ability to negotiate specific obstacles. These qualities are defined as k3 ambulator or level 4 suggesting, the amputee subject can perform all skills with greater ease.Item 21 accounts for the use of particular assistive devices.[2][4] Validity[edit | edit source]The concurrent validity of the AMP was tested against 2 known tests, the 6-minute walk, which is a rehabilitation standard, and the Amputee Activity Survey (AAS), which has been shown to be a valid subjective instrument for amputee subjects. The 6-minute walk distance showed a moderate to high positive relationship with both the AMPnoPRO and AMPPRO (r =.69, PPredictive validity of the AMP was also examined by first determining the relationship between the 6-minute walk distance and the AMPnoPRO test, age, time after amputation, and comorbidity. The overall model was statistically significant (P[2]Another study withAmputee Mobility Predictor (AMP) - studylib.net
MB Number of libraries ? Suitable for Everyone Ads Contains ads Alternatives for the Fantasy Predictor app Fantasy Predictor compared with similar apps Keywords that only this app has Pl Include Week Point Game Potential Improved Common keywords of similar apps Fantasy Players App Fpl Football Prediction Team Keywords missing from this app League Teams Live Player Cricket Tips Match Premier Sports Expert Leagues News Analysis Dream Recent Playing Updates Advice Provide Make Matches Start Predictions Nfl Points Top Features Tools Stats Fantasypros Latest Draft Season Captain Create Free Rankings Reports Experts Users Https Information Downloads over time Fantasy Predictor has been downloaded 240 times. Over the past 30 days, it has been downloaded 0 times. Changelog of Fantasy Predictor Developer information for Matthew Emeh Are you the developer of this app? Join us for free to see more information about your app and learn how we can help you promote and earn money with your app. I'm the developer of this app Share and embed Fantasy Predictor Embed Comments on Fantasy Predictor for Android ★★★★★ Amazing UI and Lovely Graphics! Gives near accurate predictions for player performances. 5 ⭐ all day. Google Play Rankings for Fantasy Predictor This app is not ranked Technologies used by Fantasy Predictor Fantasy Predictor is requesting 10 permissions and we don't have library information (yet). Show details Back to top. Page 2 and 3: 614 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 4 and 5: 616 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 6 and 7: 618 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page 8 and 9: 620 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 622 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 624 AMPUTEE MOBILITY PREDICTOR, Gai; Page : 626 AMPUTEE MOBILITYComments
82 patients with lower limb loss compared the predictive ability of the AMPnoPRO to a single limb balance test, and the Lower-Extremity Motor Coordination Test. They measured outcome with the TUG, the 2-min Walking Test, and K levels. The AMPnoPRO was found to be the best statistical predictor for mobility outcome with a prosthesis. Further research is needed as this was a small sample size. [5]Reliability[edit | edit source]Gailey et al tested the intra and inter-rater reliability of the AMP with and without a prosthesis using Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). The inter-rater score demonstrated excellent reliability (.99) for the AMPPRO and the AMPnoPRO. Test-retest intra-rater reliability also had excellent reliability, with rater 1 and rater 2 ICC scores of .96 and .98, respectively, for the AMPPRO. ICC scores for the AMPnoPRO were .97 and .86, respectively, for rater 1 and rater 2.[2]Resources:[edit | edit source]-Amputee mobility predictor-Predictor, A. M., Index, L. C., Group, S. I., Medicine, A., Index, R. M., Index, T. B., … Classification, I. (2005). Lower Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures : A Review of the Literature 1995 to 2005 Elizabeth Condie , Grad Dip Phys , FCSP , Helen Scott , Grad Dip Phys , MCSP , and Shaun Treweek , BSc , PhD American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists Lower Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures : A Review of the Literature 1995 to 2005.-Kaluf, B. (2014). Evaluation of Mobility in Persons with Limb Loss Using the Amputee Mobility Predictor and the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Y Mobility Subscale: A Six-Month Retrospective Chart Review, 26(2).References[edit | edit source]↑ Côté-Martin ME, Tremblay A, Couture M, Roy J-S. Translation, reliability, and validity of the French version of the Amputee Mobility Predictor. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2020;32(2):101-6.↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Gailey, R. S., Roach, K. E., Applegate, E. B., Cho, B., Cunniffe, B., Licht, S., … Cho, B. (2002). The Amputee Mobility Predictor : An Instrument to Assess Determinants of the Lower-Limb Amputee ’ s Ability to Ambulate, 83(May). Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Ganyard H, Knapp-Wood J, McDonough K, Palmisano T. Amputee mobility predictor-bilateral: a performance-based measure of mobility for people with bilateral lower-limb loss. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2013 Nov 1;50(7). ↑ Mission Gait. Amputee Mobility Predictor - Setup and Instruction. Sep 2019. Available from: Spaan MH, Vrieling AH, van de Berg P, Dijkstra PU, van Keeken HG. Predicting mobility outcome in lower limb amputees with motor ability tests used in early rehabilitation. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2017 Apr;41(2):171-7.
2025-04-04Where he was walking while wearing other prosthetics before the Linx, but he doesn't have to do that now. Understanding Prosthetics Whether you are helping a new amputee or somebody who has been an amputee for awhile, prosthetic technology can be overwhelming. We explain some of the technology behind today’s prosthetics and how Blatchford uses the natural working of the human body to influence the design of our products. The Blatchford Community For over 130 years Blatchford has designed and produced some of the world's most advanced artificial limbs and mobility solutions. Learn more about resources available to help you and/or the amputee in your life! Become an Ambassador of Mobility! Our Ambassadors are current amputees and caregivers who are busy telling their stories and helping others in their community. They are raising public awareness around limb loss and care about making a positive difference in people's lives.They are inspirational, motivational and unstoppable positive forces in the lower limb amputee community!Please consider joining our Ambassadors of Mobility! We'd love to have you share your experience as a caregiver in the amputee community! IntroducingLinx Fully integrated, microprocessor controlled lower limb system for above knee amputees.Key Features• Situational Awareness - Integrated sensors continuously collect data to seamlessly adapt the limb’s response.• Varying levels of stance resistance to optimise safety at all times: - Standing support - Supported sitting - Controlled stance support - Stumble recovery - Dynamic stair descent - Dynamic slope descent• Cycling Mode and Fixed Angle Flexion Lock Mode• Knee Flexion to 130°• Intuitive Programming Software via PC or App• Up to 3 days battery life• Sandal Toe Foot Shell
2025-04-15Objective[edit | edit source]Amputee mobility predictor (AMP) is a quick and easily administered assessment tool designed to measure the functional status of lower-limb amputees with (AMPPRO) and without (AMPnoPRO) the use of a prosthesis.The test was also designed to be clinically feasible in that it takes less than 10 to 15 minutes to administer and requires very little equipment.AMP can be used before prosthetic fitting to predict functional mobility after prosthetic fitting.[1] Although the AMP can be administered both with (AMPPRO) and without (AMPnoPRO) a prosthesis, the AMPnoPRO has the greatest potential to assist in prosthetic prescription.The AMP was also designed to assess the specific tasks identified in the 5-level Medicare functional classification system (MFCL). MFCL was developed in 1995 by the US Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) to describe the functional abilities of persons who had undergone lower-limb amputation. (K0, K1, K2, K3, K4)[2]K-Level 0Does not have the ability or potential to ambulate or transfer safely with or without assistance, and a prosthesis does not enhance quality of life or mobility.K-Level 1Has the ability or potential to use a prosthesis for transfers or ambulation in level surfaces at a fixed cadence. Typical of the limited and unlimited household ambulatorK-Level 2Has the ability or potential for ambulation with the ability to transverse low-level environmental barriers such as curbs, stairs, or uneven surfaces. Typical of the limited community ambulator.K-Level 3Has the ability or potential for ambulation with variable cadence. Typical of the community ambulator who has the ability to transverse most environmental barriers and may have vocational, therapeutic, or exercise activity that demands prosthetic use beyond simple locomotion.K-Level 4Has the ability or potential for prosthetic ambulation that exceeds basic ambulation skills, exhibiting high impact, stress, or energy levels. Typical of the prosthetic demands of the child, active adult, or athlete.Intended Population[edit | edit source]Unilateral or Bilateral Lower limb amputees. However, bilateral amputee subjects with amputation levels higher than trans-tarsal foot amputations may be tested only with the AMPPRO because it is not physically possible for them to perform the AMPnoPRO.[2] However, an AMP-Bilat was developed that adapted the scoring for people with bilateral limb loss. These changes included not deducting points for using hands to rise from a chair or immediate balance in standing. In the AMPPRO people with bilateral limb loss will score lower and thus show a lower potential for ambulation, these factors are taken into consideration in the AMP-Bilat. [3] Example of the AMP-Bilat Form.Methods of Use[edit | edit source]The total score range for the AMP is 0 to 42 points. In its AMPnoPRO configuration, the highest possible score is 38 points because item 8, single-limb standing, is eliminated (standing on the prosthetic side is impossible). By using
2025-04-20An assistive device, the subjects’ potential total score possibilities increase by 5 points (to 43 and 47 points for the AMPnoPRO and AMPRO, respectively), depending on the type of assistive device used during testing.Most AMP items offer 3 scoring choices: 0 indicates inability to perform the task, 1 implies minimal level of achievement or that some assistance was required in completing the task, and 2 denotes complete independence or mastery of the task The items are organized with an increasing level of difficulty to allow for the progressive assessment of the amputee.Items 1 and 2 test the ability to maintain sitting balance. The sitting reach test assesses the ability to displace one’s center of mass (COM) and to return to balanced sitting without falling. If the amputee subject does not have the ability to sit and reach in sitting independently, then the possibility for even limited prosthetic use is remote and the amputee subject therefore would be classed as a level K0.Items 3 through 7 are designed to examine the amputee subject’s ability to maintain balance while performing the relatively simple task of transferring from chair to chair and standing unchallenged. These skills are necessary for a level 1 amputee subject who would receive a prosthesis for transfers and simple standing activities. The ability to perform these test items safely would probably suggest that the patient could manage a prosthesis in limited situations, especially in a supervised environment.Items 8 through 13 are more challenging activities related to standing balance. Subject performs several tests including; single-limb balance, modified standing reach test, nudge test, and check reactive balance. In order to maintain balance during these tests subject requires adequate somatosensory and vestibular systems. Succeeding these tests means that the amputee subject has the potential to be a safe household ambulator; that is, he/she can function at level K2AMP items 14 through 20 evaluate the quality of gait and the ability to negotiate specific obstacles. These qualities are defined as k3 ambulator or level 4 suggesting, the amputee subject can perform all skills with greater ease.Item 21 accounts for the use of particular assistive devices.[2][4] Validity[edit | edit source]The concurrent validity of the AMP was tested against 2 known tests, the 6-minute walk, which is a rehabilitation standard, and the Amputee Activity Survey (AAS), which has been shown to be a valid subjective instrument for amputee subjects. The 6-minute walk distance showed a moderate to high positive relationship with both the AMPnoPRO and AMPPRO (r =.69, PPredictive validity of the AMP was also examined by first determining the relationship between the 6-minute walk distance and the AMPnoPRO test, age, time after amputation, and comorbidity. The overall model was statistically significant (P[2]Another study with
2025-03-29Calculation of start/stop RT values reported in the main .parquet report--peak-translation instructs DIA-NN to take advantage of the co-elution of isotopologues, when identifying and quantifying precursors; automatically activated when using --channels--peptidoforms enables peptidoform confidence scoring--pg-level [N] controls the protein inference mode, with 0 - isoforms, 1 - protein names (as in UniProt), 2 - genes--predict-n-frag [N] specifies the maximum number of fragments predicted by the deep learning predictor, default value is 12--predictor instructs DIA-NN to perform deep learning-based prediction of spectra, retention times and ion mobility values--prefix [string] adds a string at the beginning of each file name (specified with --f) - convenient when working with automatic scripts for the generation of config files--prosit export prosit input based on the FASTA digest--proteoforms enables the proteoform confidence scoring mode--pr-filter [file name] specify a file containing a list of precursors (same format as the Precursor.Id column in DIA-NN output), FASTA digest will be filtered to only include these precursors--qvalue [X] specifies the precursor-level q-value filtering threshold--quant-acc [X] sets the precision-accuracy balance for QuantUMS to X, where X must be between 0 and 1--quant-ori-names .quant files will retain original raw file names even if saved to a separate directory, convenient for .quant file manipulation--quant-fr [N] sets the number of top fragment ions among which the fragments that will be used for quantification are chosen for the legacy (pre-QuantUMS) quantification mode. Default value is 6--quick-mass-acc (experimental) when choosing the MS2 mass accuracy setting automatically, DIA-NN will use a fast heuristical algorithm instead of IDs number optimisation--quant-no-ms1 instructs QuantUMS not to use the recorded MS1 quantities directly--quant-params [params] use previously obtained QuantUMS parameters--quant-sel-runs [N] instructs QuantUMS to train its parameters on N automatically chosen runs, to speed up training for large experiments, N here must be 6 or greater--quant-tims-sum for slice/scanning timsTOF methods, calculate intensities
2025-04-12Aviator Game Predictor Online Updated 2025-01-13 Current Version 1.1.4 Offered By Features of Aviator Game Predictor Online on PC With all your passion for playing Aviator Game Predictor Online, you hands are not supposed to be limited on a tiny screen of your phone. Play like a pro and get full control of your game with keyboard and mouse. MEmu offers you all the things that you are expecting. Download and play Aviator Game Predictor Online on PC. Play as long as you want, no more limitations of battery, mobile data and disturbing calls. The brand new MEmu 9 is the best choice of playing Aviator Game Predictor Online on PC. Prepared with our expertise, the exquisite preset keymapping system makes Aviator Game Predictor Online a real PC game. MEmu multi-instance manager makes playing 2 or more accounts on the same device possible. And the most important, our exclusive emulation engine can release full potential of your PC, make everything smooth. Screenshots & Video of Aviator Game Predictor Online PC Download Aviator Game Predictor Online on PC with MEmu Android Emulator. Enjoy playing on big screen. Aviator Game Predictor: Fly long to win big, but beware the crash. Game Info Aviator Game Predictor: Fly long to win big, but beware the crash.Experience the thrill of the skies with Aviator Game Predictor, the premier high-stakes game featuring heart-pumping plane rides. Fly higher and longer with Aviator to increase your winning coefficient, but be careful not to crash and lose it all. Take on the challenge and test your luck with Aviator predictor, where the sky's the limit. Download now and soar to new heights with this exciting game! How to Download Aviator Game Predictor Online on PC 1. Download MEmu installer and finish the setup 2. Start MEmu then open Google
2025-04-19