Okla test

Court to the same effect include: Diamond v. Enid Milling Co., 149 Okla. 61, 299 P. 440; State v. Hinkle, 143 Okla. 33, 287 P. 722; Eldridge v. Vance, 138 Okla. 201, 280 P. 570; Queen Insurance Co. of America v. Baker, 174 Okla. 273, 50 P.2d 371. The latest expression of this court upon this question seems to be Myrick v. City of Tulsa, 175 Okla. 647, 54 P.2d 330, wherein this court held:"When jury has returned its verdict, trial court is without jurisdiction to enter judgment non obstante veredicto unless (1) party in whose favor judgment is rendered would be entitled to judgment on the pleadings, or (2) the jury has returned special findings of fact contrary to the general verdict."¶15 A motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict does not present for consideration errors in the admission of evidence or the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co., 63 Okla. 292, 165 P. 176; Bank of Commerce of Sulphur v. Webster, 70 Okla. 68, 172 P. 943.¶16 This court has held that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be overruled, where there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict of the jury. Stanfield v. Lincoln, 150 Okla. 289, 1 P.2d 387; Oklahoma Produce Co. v. Cotton Products Co., 111 Okla. 257, 239 P. 656.¶17 The judgment of the trial court, rendering judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury shows conclusively that it was based upon

Teak style swim platform, reclining helm chair, 2 chaise lounges, changing room, entertainment station with cooler, Comfort-Step padding for floor, 2 rear lounges, 12-volt outlet, full instrumentation and Sony stereo.Options on the Test BoatStainless propeller, in-floor storage, Deluxe package that includes a ski/tow bar, courtesy rope lighting, removable cupholders, 2 extra speakers, ottoman, lighted cupholders, accessory pouch and Sony stereo remote at swim platform. Vital Stats & InfoNumber of Occupants - 12Price As Tested With Power - $52.9KMaximum Speed - 49.3 mphWild Ponies - 250hpNo. of Gates - 30-20 MPH - 4.6 seconds Ladder Steps - 5Ladder Depth - 3' 10" LOA - 25' 6"Beam - 8' 6" Hull Design - 3 PontoonsDry Weight - 2,400 lbs.Fuel Capacity - 50 GallonsTallest Rail Onboard - Stern 26.5"Shortest Rail Onboard - Bow 26"Changing Room Height - 6' Test Drive RPM vs. SPEED vs. D-A 600 3.2 mph 79 1000 5.2 mph 74.5 1500 6.8 mph 842000 10.1 mph 89 2500 14.5 mph 92 3000 18.6 mph 93.5 3500 21.9 mph 94.5 4000 25.5 mph 97 4500 31.3 mph 100 5000 36.9 mph 100.55500 44.8 mph 103.56000 49.3 mph 101.5PRICEPrice As Tested $52,931(Boat and Motor)Base Price(Boat Only) $32,100Seminole, Okla.405-382-0349www.silverwavepontoons.comDon't forget to check out the video of the test:

Yorktown, N.Y. Yorktown HS Junior Yorktown, N.Y. Yorktown HS D 6'0" 180 lbs So. Eustis, Fla. Montverde Academy Sophomore Eustis, Fla. Montverde Academy D 6'0" 190 lbs Fr. Canandaigua, N.Y. Canandaigua Academy Freshman Canandaigua, N.Y. Canandaigua Academy Junior Islip, N.Y. Islip HS A 5'8" 150 lbs Fr. Tulsa, Okla. Jenks HS Freshman Tulsa, Okla. Jenks HS A 5'8" 155 lbs Fr. Cumming, Ga. North Forsyth HS Freshman Cumming, Ga. North Forsyth HS M 6'7" 195 lbs Fr. Charlotte, N.C. Providence HS Freshman Charlotte, N.C. Providence HS DM 5'9" 170 lbs Jr. Dunkirk, Md. Southern HS Junior Dunkirk, Md. Southern HS M 6'3" 205 lbs Fr. Canandaigua, N.Y. Canandaigua Academy Freshman Canandaigua, N.Y. Canandaigua Academy DM 6'3" 195 lbs Jr. Bay Shore, N.Y. Bay Shore HS Junior Bay Shore, N.Y. Bay Shore HS FO 5'11" 190 lbs Fr. Holly Springs, N.C. Apex HS Freshman Holly Springs, N.C. Apex HS LSM 5'9" 170 lbs So. Henrietta, N.Y. Rush Henrietta HS Sophomore Henrietta, N.Y. Rush Henrietta HS M 6'0" 165 lbs Fr. Franklin, Tenn. Page HS Freshman Franklin, Tenn. Page HS LSM 5'8" 155 lbs Fr. Acworth, Ga. North Paulding HS Freshman Acworth, Ga. North Paulding HS A 6'2" 220 lbs Fr. Plantation, Fla. St Thomas Aquinas Freshman Plantation, Fla. St Thomas Aquinas M 6'1" 200 lbs Jr. Jenks, Okla. Jenks HS Lindenwood Junior Jenks, Okla. Jenks HS Lindenwood A 6'2" 185 lbs Jr. Suwanee, Ga. North Gwinnett HS Junior Suwanee, Ga. North Gwinnett HS DM 5'9" 175 lbs Sr. Calverton, N.Y. Riverhead HS Senior Calverton, N.Y. Riverhead HS M 5'9" 185 lbs So. Camp Hill, Pa. Cumberland Valley HS Sophomore Camp Hill, Pa. Cumberland Valley HS M 6'3" 190 lbs Jr. Blufton, S.C. May River HS Junior Blufton, S.C. May River HS D 6'4" 220 lbs Sr. Lewes, Del. Cape Henlopen Senior Lewes, Del. Cape Henlopen D 6'0" 160 lbs So. Mattituck, N.Y. Mattituck HS Sophomore Mattituck, N.Y. Mattituck HS D 6'4" 215 lbs Sr. Tega Cay, S.C. Fort Mill HS Senior Tega Cay, S.C. Fort Mill HS D 5'10" 200 lbs So. Plainedge, N.Y. Plainedge HS Sophomore Plainedge, N.Y. Plainedge HS

First. Nat. Bank, 169 Okla. 90, 36 P.2d 27. In the instant case it cannot be successfully contended that the plaintiff's petition did not state a cause of action against the defendant. Neither the petition nor the reply contains allegations showing the cause of action barred by the statute of limitations which might present only a question of law to be determined by the court. Neither can it be said that the answer of the defendant fails to set up a defense, which, if proved as alleged, would entitle the defendant to a judgment in its favor. The petition and answer, together with the reply denying allegations of new matters in the petition, have presented controverted questions of fact which could be properly determined only by testimony, and a judgment on the pleadings would have been reversible error. Peck v. First Nat. Bank of Claremore, 50 Okla. 252, 150 P. 1039.¶12 Section 429, O. S. 1931, provides:"Where, upon the statement in the pleadings, one party is entitled by law to judgment in his favor, judgment shall be so rendered by the court, though a verdict has been found against such party."¶13 In Beard v. W. T. Rawleigh Co., 136 Okla. 165, 277 P. 657, this court, following many former decisions of this court, held:"In the absence of special findings, it is error to render judgment notwithstanding the verdict unless the party in whose favor such judgment is rendered is entitled to judgment on the pleadings."¶14 More recent decisions of this