Ssd test
Author: i | 2025-04-24
as ssd benchmark, test ssd benchmark, solid state drives, ssd performance, hdd benchmark, benchmark, ssd, hdd, tests AS SSD Benchmark as ssd benchmark, test ssd benchmark, solid state drives, ssd performance, hdd benchmark, benchmark, ssd, hdd, tests AS SSD Benchmark
Test results of SSD and SSD FFM.
4GB. Each test was conducted upto 64MB I/O and we recorded the sequential performance and the IO/s:ATTO Disk Benchmark Test #1256MB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.91GB/s256MB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.62GB/sATTO Disk Benchmark Test #21GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.88GB/s1GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.62GB/sATTO Disk Benchmark Test #34GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.88GB/s4GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.49GB/sThe next test of the WD Black SN770 SSD involved CrystalDisk Benchmark and I tested a 1GB, 4GB and 16GB File scale.CRYSTALDISK MARK 1GB TESTCRYSTALDISK MARK 4GB TESTCRYSTALDISK MARK 16GB TESTNext, I switched to AS SSD benchmark. A much more thorough test through, I used 1GB, 3GB and 5GB test files. Each test includes throughput benchmarks and IOPS that are respective to the larger file sizes (important, if you are reading this and trying to compare against the reported 4K IOPS from the manufacturer).AS SSD Benchmark Test #1AS SSD Benchmark Test #2AS SSD Benchmark Test #3Ordinarily, I would introduce tests like BlackMagic and AJA into the mix here, but even a short burst of testing on an NVMe like this would over saturate the cache memory on board. Nevertheless, in the short term we still could ascertain the reported performance on 1GB, 4GB and 16GB file testing was:4GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,357MB/s Read & 4,711MB/s Write16GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,364MB/s Read & 4,715MB/s Write16GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,715MB/s Read & 4,371MB/s WriteThe overall performance throughout all testing largely exceeded the reported maximum by WD themselves, which I was very impressed by. Sustained performance was unsurprisingly poorer as the borrowed system memory and controller became overworking in the larger and longer-running tests, but in shorter bursts, the drive clearly did what they said it can do and more. Let’s conclude today’s review and work out what we think of the WD Black SN770 SSD.WD Black SN770 SSD Review – Conclusion & VerdictYou can not really fault the WD Black SN850 SSD in terms of what Western Digital has said this drive can do, as it not only meets those expectations consistently but also exceeds it more often than not by a few degrees. The WD Black SN850 SSD is not going to challenge the current generation of 7K performing drives, but then it is not trying to. This is a mid-range SSD that serves as an entry point into PCIe 4 storage for many and in that tier of storage, the WD Black SN770 SSD unquestionably succeeds. That said, this SSD is at this price and at this power efficiency by design and the fact it took WD this long to release a 2nd entry into their PCIe4
Cara Test SSD Throttling! (SSD Stress Test) - YouTube
To rendering expectations, throughput, file read/write expectations for transfers and that kind of thing.Benchmark Results: The AJA System Test results showed the LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB external drive was capable of averaging 944 MB/s read and 878 MB/s write. The capture and playback was fairly smooth as performance as you can see in the performance over time charts shown in the results above.Benchmark Results: The LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB did really well on this benchmark as it is the fastest USB 3.1 Gen 2 portable SSD that we have ever tested!Blackmagic Disk Speed TestBlackmagic Design has a storage drive benchmarking tool that customers can use to test the speed of your disk performance for working with high quality video at different resolutions and codecs.Benchmark Results: The LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB drive topped out at around 942 MB/s read and 877 MB/s write on the Disk Speed Test by Blackmagic. The results show this drive will handle all 1080P and 2K content just fine, and most 4K content. The frames on 4K 10-bit YUV 4:2:2 video were 42 read and 39 write it didn’t receive a passing mark as a result, but 40 FPS is still workable for most. Article Contents LaCie Rugged SSD - Premium NVMe SSD The SSD Benchmark Test System CrystalDiskMark, AJA System Test, Blackmagic Disk Speed Test PCMark 10 Data Drive Benchmark Large File Transfer and Game Load Benchmarks Final Thoughts & ConclusionsBest SSD Benchmark Tools for Testing SSD
Size from 1KB to 512KB.Set queue number, cool down time, and thread number.Choose the total length and a test mode from the drop-down menu.Step 5: After that, click on the Start button to begin the test.Step 6: You will get the test result after some time.Further reading:In addition to Disk Benchmark, MiniTool Partition Wizard also boasts features like Space Analyzer, Partition Recovery, Data Recovery, and Surface Test. With it, you can do various partition/disk related operations such as create/resize/move/extend/format/wipe partition, check file system, convert MBR to GPT, migrate OS to SSD/HD, copy disk, etc.MiniTool Partition Wizard is used as a file deleter, NTFS undelete program, SD card formatter, duplicate file finder, Window migration tool, or an SSD optimizer. It provides you with a MiniTool Portable Partition Manager, so you can take it with you conveniently. To explore its advanced features, please use MiniTool Partition Wizard Pro or higher editions.MiniTool Partition Wizard DemoClick to Download100%Clean & SafeAlso read: The Guide to Test and Improve USB 3.0 Speed [With Pictures]#2. CrystalDiskMarkCrystalDiskMark is an HDD benchmark utility that allows you to measure the sequential and random read/write speeds of your disk. It is compatible with Windows 11/10/8.1/8/7/Vista/XP and Windows Server 2003/2008/2012/2016/2019/2022. It is an open-source and free hard drive test tool.When you use CrystalDiskMark to test storage devices, you should pay attention to the items below.MB/s refers to 1, 000, 000 bytes per second.The test result is not compatible between different major versions.The result varies according to test file size, test file position, fragmentation, IDE (PATA)/SATA/RAID/SCSI/NVMe controller, CPU speed, etc.CrystalDiskMark may shorten the lifespan of the SSD/USB flash drive.If you run CrystalDiskMark with admin rights, it won’t show the network drive. To measure the performance of network drives, run as w/o Administrator rights by opening the UAC dialog window > clicking Yes > clicking w/ Administrator Rights, NO > w/o Administrator Rights.To learn more detailed information about this tool, read this post.#3. AS SSD BenchmarkAs its name indicates, AS SSD Benchmark can test the speed of all installed SSDs on the computer. To help you know the performance while the hard drive copies, reads, and writes data, it performs three separate tests. In addition to that, it also determines the access time of an SSD.With AS SSD Benchmark, you can find any issues that your computer is experiencing. Then you can take actions immediately. It displays all the information it finds in a table. Importantly, it offers you a portable version. It works on Windows 7 or above.#4. UserBenchMarkUserBenchMark is a free all-one benchmark tool, which can test the performance of CPU, GPU, SSD, HDD, and USB drives. After it finishes the test, it compares results with other users and tells you which part you can upgrade and the expected performance enhancement.Can You Upgrade a Prebuilt PC? How to Upgrade CPU/GPU/Storage?#5. HD TuneHD Tune is a feature-rich hard disk/SSD benchmark and diagnose tool. To be specific, it is capable of scanning for errors, testing the performance of disks, erasing disks securely, checking the. as ssd benchmark, test ssd benchmark, solid state drives, ssd performance, hdd benchmark, benchmark, ssd, hdd, tests AS SSD BenchmarkUnderstanding AS SSD Test Data: Decoding SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 Benchmark Source:AS SSD CrystalDiskMark is a drive benchmark tool which conducts a series of Sequential, 512K and 4K read and write tests. 100MB test 500MB test 1000MB test 2000MB test 4000MB test CrystalDiskMark 100MB Test 500MB Test 1,000MB Test 2,000MB Test 4,000MB Test Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Sequential (MB/s) : 196.9 173.5 189.3 182.3 199.3 186.8 197.3 184.5 199.0 185.8 512K (MB/s) : 151.9 33.45 152.8 26.9 153.9 24.32 151.3 24.40 150.4 23.47 4K (MB/s) : 15.01 5.33 14.01 6.4 14.41 10.2 14.22 10.13 14.01 10.14 4K QD32 (MB/s) : 12.77 5.28 11.38 4.4 11.03 4.95 10.99 3.75 10.84 3.12The SD Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive scores 196M/s Read & 173.5MB/s Write in the 100MB Sequential test of CrystalDiskMark.The test results peak at 199MB/s Read in the 1000MB and 4000MB tests. Write test results peak at 186.8MB/s in the 1000MB test. These results surpass SD's advertised capabilities for this 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive, which are based on the 100MB test result. AS SSD 1.6.4013 Benchmark Source:AS SSD The AS SSD benchmark determines the performance of Solid State Drives (SSD). The tool contains six synthetic and three copy tests. In AS SSD we see similarly quick results from the Sandisk Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive. It achieves a score of 179MB/s Read / 175MB/s Write in the sequential test. These results are in line with the manufacturers advertised capabilities. SiSoft Sandra 2012 - Removable Storage Source:Sandra Sandra is designed to test the theoretical power of a complete system and individual components. The numbers taken though are again, purely theoretical and may not represent real world performance. Higher numbers represent better performance. Sandra 2012 Removable Storage Read / Write Tests (MB/s) Cap. Data Interface 4 KB Test (MB/s) 64 KB Test (MB/s) 1MB Test(MB/s) 16MB Test(MB/s) 256MB Test(MB/s) Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write SanDisk Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 5.72 2 88.38 61.28 165.88 158 169 33.08 188.4 159.83 Patriot Memory 64GB USB 3.0 5.82 0.233 53.33 3.24 67.5 15.81 96.34 18.56 122.39 45.76 Supertalent Luxio 64GB3DMark SSD storage benchmark tests SSD
By May 21, 2018 SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD Performance BenchmarksTo benchmark the SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD we’ll be using CrystalDiskMark, ATTO Disk Benchmark, Anvil’s Storage Utilities, AJA System Test, and a manual file transfer test. These five benchmarks should paint a good overall picture of how this portable SSD performs, so you know what kind of performance to expect before making a purchase that could be up to $630.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD CrystalDiskMark: When it comes to sequential read/write performance we topped out at just shy of 560 MB/s read and right around 500 MB/s write on the 1TB model that we tested. Not bad and exceeds the series rated speeds of up to 550MB/s read speeds and up to 500 MB/s write speeds.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD ATTO: ATTO Disk Benchmark showed that we were getting up to 562 MB/s read and 527 MB/s write speeds on the SanDisk 1TB Extreme Portable SSD through the USB 3.1 Type-C port on our Dell XPS 13 laptop.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD Anvil: Anvil’s Storage Utilities benchmark finished with an overall score of 2,818.89 points on the SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD with no modifications to Windows 10. The sequential read speeds were 482 MB/s and the sequential write speeds were 443 MB/s. Random 4K read/write performance isn’t that important on a secondary drive, but some will likely try using this as a boot drive at some point in time. We are seeing 21/39 MB/s Random 4K read/write speeds on this portable drive, which is pretty solid.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD AJA System Test: AJA System Test by AJA Video Systems measures system disk performance using video test files of different resolutions, sizes and codecs. We selected the standard 4K UltraHD resolution, a test file size of 1GB and the ProRes 4444 codec to see how this drive does with regard to video rendering performance. ProRes 4444 is used for heavy effects work and deep color projects. FPS is very important for this market as well as MB/s, so we’ll be talking about both FPS and MB/s performance here. TheBest SSD Benchmark Tools for Testing SSD Performance
By March 19, 2018 ATTO & CrystalDiskMarkATTO v3.05ATTO is one of the oldest drive benchmarks still being used today and is still very relevant in the SSD world. ATTO measures transfers across a specific volume length. It measures raw transfer rates for both reads and writes and places the data into graphs that can be very easily interpreted. The test was run with the default runs of 0.5KB through 64MB transfer sizes with the total length being 256MB.ATTO – Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB:Benchmark Results: ATTO showed the Samsung SSD 860 500 GB drive reaching speeds of up to 566 MB/s read and 536 MB/s write in the standard overlapped I/O benchmark. This drive is rated at up to 520 MB/s max sequential read and 520 MB/s max sequential write, so we exceeded both of those scores on our test platform. It should be noted that this is the first SATA III drive that we have ever tested to reach 566 MB/s sequential read speeds! The Samsung SSD 860 EVO really does milk all the performance one can get from the SATA III interface! Benchmark Results: There isn’t a huge difference between most SATA III SSDs when it comes to sequential read/write performance, but Samsung’s 860 EVO 500GB drive stands out as having the best performance at the lower block sizes and is right up there at the higher sizes. CrystalDiskMark 6.0.0 x64CrystalDiskMark is a small benchmark utility for drives and enables rapid measurement of sequential and random read/write speeds. Note that CDM only supports Native Command Queuing (NCQ) with a queue depth of 32 (as noted) and shows the highest score of five runs.CystalDiskmark – Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB:Benchmark Results: The Samsung SSD 860 PRO 500GB drive reached 563.7 MB/s read and 533.5 MB/s write in the standard sequential write test and Random 4K performance was 44.66 MB/s read and 124.8 MB/s write. Benchmark Results: The Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB drive reached 507.2 MB/s read and 482.5 MB/s write in the standard sequential write test at a queue depth of one. Let’s look at some other benchmarks! Article Contents Samsung 860 EVO Aims For SATA III Performance Perfection The SSD Benchmark Test System & TRIM Support Anvil Storage Utilities & AIDA64 ATTO & CrystalDiskMark AS SSD Benchmark Linear Write and Real World File Transfer Testing Final Thoughts & Conclusions. as ssd benchmark, test ssd benchmark, solid state drives, ssd performance, hdd benchmark, benchmark, ssd, hdd, tests AS SSD BenchmarkComments
4GB. Each test was conducted upto 64MB I/O and we recorded the sequential performance and the IO/s:ATTO Disk Benchmark Test #1256MB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.91GB/s256MB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.62GB/sATTO Disk Benchmark Test #21GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.88GB/s1GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.62GB/sATTO Disk Benchmark Test #34GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 4.88GB/s4GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 4.49GB/sThe next test of the WD Black SN770 SSD involved CrystalDisk Benchmark and I tested a 1GB, 4GB and 16GB File scale.CRYSTALDISK MARK 1GB TESTCRYSTALDISK MARK 4GB TESTCRYSTALDISK MARK 16GB TESTNext, I switched to AS SSD benchmark. A much more thorough test through, I used 1GB, 3GB and 5GB test files. Each test includes throughput benchmarks and IOPS that are respective to the larger file sizes (important, if you are reading this and trying to compare against the reported 4K IOPS from the manufacturer).AS SSD Benchmark Test #1AS SSD Benchmark Test #2AS SSD Benchmark Test #3Ordinarily, I would introduce tests like BlackMagic and AJA into the mix here, but even a short burst of testing on an NVMe like this would over saturate the cache memory on board. Nevertheless, in the short term we still could ascertain the reported performance on 1GB, 4GB and 16GB file testing was:4GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,357MB/s Read & 4,711MB/s Write16GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,364MB/s Read & 4,715MB/s Write16GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 4,715MB/s Read & 4,371MB/s WriteThe overall performance throughout all testing largely exceeded the reported maximum by WD themselves, which I was very impressed by. Sustained performance was unsurprisingly poorer as the borrowed system memory and controller became overworking in the larger and longer-running tests, but in shorter bursts, the drive clearly did what they said it can do and more. Let’s conclude today’s review and work out what we think of the WD Black SN770 SSD.WD Black SN770 SSD Review – Conclusion & VerdictYou can not really fault the WD Black SN850 SSD in terms of what Western Digital has said this drive can do, as it not only meets those expectations consistently but also exceeds it more often than not by a few degrees. The WD Black SN850 SSD is not going to challenge the current generation of 7K performing drives, but then it is not trying to. This is a mid-range SSD that serves as an entry point into PCIe 4 storage for many and in that tier of storage, the WD Black SN770 SSD unquestionably succeeds. That said, this SSD is at this price and at this power efficiency by design and the fact it took WD this long to release a 2nd entry into their PCIe4
2025-04-17To rendering expectations, throughput, file read/write expectations for transfers and that kind of thing.Benchmark Results: The AJA System Test results showed the LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB external drive was capable of averaging 944 MB/s read and 878 MB/s write. The capture and playback was fairly smooth as performance as you can see in the performance over time charts shown in the results above.Benchmark Results: The LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB did really well on this benchmark as it is the fastest USB 3.1 Gen 2 portable SSD that we have ever tested!Blackmagic Disk Speed TestBlackmagic Design has a storage drive benchmarking tool that customers can use to test the speed of your disk performance for working with high quality video at different resolutions and codecs.Benchmark Results: The LaCie Rugged SSD 1TB drive topped out at around 942 MB/s read and 877 MB/s write on the Disk Speed Test by Blackmagic. The results show this drive will handle all 1080P and 2K content just fine, and most 4K content. The frames on 4K 10-bit YUV 4:2:2 video were 42 read and 39 write it didn’t receive a passing mark as a result, but 40 FPS is still workable for most. Article Contents LaCie Rugged SSD - Premium NVMe SSD The SSD Benchmark Test System CrystalDiskMark, AJA System Test, Blackmagic Disk Speed Test PCMark 10 Data Drive Benchmark Large File Transfer and Game Load Benchmarks Final Thoughts & Conclusions
2025-03-29CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 Benchmark Source:AS SSD CrystalDiskMark is a drive benchmark tool which conducts a series of Sequential, 512K and 4K read and write tests. 100MB test 500MB test 1000MB test 2000MB test 4000MB test CrystalDiskMark 100MB Test 500MB Test 1,000MB Test 2,000MB Test 4,000MB Test Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Sequential (MB/s) : 196.9 173.5 189.3 182.3 199.3 186.8 197.3 184.5 199.0 185.8 512K (MB/s) : 151.9 33.45 152.8 26.9 153.9 24.32 151.3 24.40 150.4 23.47 4K (MB/s) : 15.01 5.33 14.01 6.4 14.41 10.2 14.22 10.13 14.01 10.14 4K QD32 (MB/s) : 12.77 5.28 11.38 4.4 11.03 4.95 10.99 3.75 10.84 3.12The SD Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive scores 196M/s Read & 173.5MB/s Write in the 100MB Sequential test of CrystalDiskMark.The test results peak at 199MB/s Read in the 1000MB and 4000MB tests. Write test results peak at 186.8MB/s in the 1000MB test. These results surpass SD's advertised capabilities for this 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive, which are based on the 100MB test result. AS SSD 1.6.4013 Benchmark Source:AS SSD The AS SSD benchmark determines the performance of Solid State Drives (SSD). The tool contains six synthetic and three copy tests. In AS SSD we see similarly quick results from the Sandisk Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 flash drive. It achieves a score of 179MB/s Read / 175MB/s Write in the sequential test. These results are in line with the manufacturers advertised capabilities. SiSoft Sandra 2012 - Removable Storage Source:Sandra Sandra is designed to test the theoretical power of a complete system and individual components. The numbers taken though are again, purely theoretical and may not represent real world performance. Higher numbers represent better performance. Sandra 2012 Removable Storage Read / Write Tests (MB/s) Cap. Data Interface 4 KB Test (MB/s) 64 KB Test (MB/s) 1MB Test(MB/s) 16MB Test(MB/s) 256MB Test(MB/s) Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write Read Write SanDisk Extreme 64GB USB 3.0 5.72 2 88.38 61.28 165.88 158 169 33.08 188.4 159.83 Patriot Memory 64GB USB 3.0 5.82 0.233 53.33 3.24 67.5 15.81 96.34 18.56 122.39 45.76 Supertalent Luxio 64GB
2025-03-30By May 21, 2018 SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD Performance BenchmarksTo benchmark the SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD we’ll be using CrystalDiskMark, ATTO Disk Benchmark, Anvil’s Storage Utilities, AJA System Test, and a manual file transfer test. These five benchmarks should paint a good overall picture of how this portable SSD performs, so you know what kind of performance to expect before making a purchase that could be up to $630.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD CrystalDiskMark: When it comes to sequential read/write performance we topped out at just shy of 560 MB/s read and right around 500 MB/s write on the 1TB model that we tested. Not bad and exceeds the series rated speeds of up to 550MB/s read speeds and up to 500 MB/s write speeds.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD ATTO: ATTO Disk Benchmark showed that we were getting up to 562 MB/s read and 527 MB/s write speeds on the SanDisk 1TB Extreme Portable SSD through the USB 3.1 Type-C port on our Dell XPS 13 laptop.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD Anvil: Anvil’s Storage Utilities benchmark finished with an overall score of 2,818.89 points on the SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD with no modifications to Windows 10. The sequential read speeds were 482 MB/s and the sequential write speeds were 443 MB/s. Random 4K read/write performance isn’t that important on a secondary drive, but some will likely try using this as a boot drive at some point in time. We are seeing 21/39 MB/s Random 4K read/write speeds on this portable drive, which is pretty solid.SanDisk Extreme 1TB Portable SSD AJA System Test: AJA System Test by AJA Video Systems measures system disk performance using video test files of different resolutions, sizes and codecs. We selected the standard 4K UltraHD resolution, a test file size of 1GB and the ProRes 4444 codec to see how this drive does with regard to video rendering performance. ProRes 4444 is used for heavy effects work and deep color projects. FPS is very important for this market as well as MB/s, so we’ll be talking about both FPS and MB/s performance here. The
2025-04-18£79$119 / £991TB ModelWDS100T3X0EWDS100T1X0EPrice in $ and $$119 / £135$249 / £1692TB ModelWDS200T3X0EWDS200T1X0EPrice in $ and $$239 / £269$399 / £339Durability & Workload500GB ModelWDS500G3X0EWDS500G1X0ETotal Terabytes Written (TBW)300TB300TBMean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours)1,750,0001,750,000DWPD0.3DWPD0.3DWPD1TB ModelWDS100T3X0EWDS100T1X0ETotal Terabytes Written (TBW)600TB600TBMean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours)1,750,0001,750,000DWPD0.3DWPD0.3DWPD2TB ModelWDS200T3X0EWDS200T1X0ETotal Terabytes Written (TBW)1200TB1200TBMean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours)1,750,0001,750,000DWPD0.3DWPD0.3DWPDSequential Throughput500GB ModelWDS500G3X0EWDS500G1X0ESequential Read (Max, MB/s), 128 KB5000MB7000MBSequential Write (Max, MB/s), 128 KB4000MB4100MB1TB ModelWDS100T3X0EWDS100T1X0ESequential Read (Max, MB/s), 128 KB5150MB7000MBSequential Write (Max, MB/s), 128 KB4900MB5300MB2TB ModelWDS200T3X0EWDS200T1X0ESequential Read (Max, MB/s), 128 KB5150MB7000MBSequential Write (Max, MB/s), 128 KB4850MB5100MB4K Random IOPS500GB ModelWDS500G3X0EWDS500G1X0ERandom Read (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32460,0001,000,000Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32800,000680,0001TB ModelWDS100T3X0EWDS100T1X0ERandom Read (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32740,0001,000,000Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32800,000720,0002TB ModelWDS200T3X0EWDS200T1X0ERandom Read (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32650,0001,000,000Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32800,000710,000The big takeaway here is that if the system you intend to install the WD Black SSD into is NOT prosumer grade, then the maximum read/write that you will see in either the WD black SN850 or SN770 is going to be a lot closer than you might think and any additional price, power use and heat that the WD Black SN850 generates might be to little benefit. Additionally, the durability on the WD Black SN770 SSD is largely the same as the SN850, despite its lower performance, so you won’t be seeking out any additional workload out of the more efficient drive. Let’s get the SN770 SSD into the test machine and see how it performs.WD Black SN770 SSD Review – Testing & BenchmarksNow we know how the WD Black SN770 SSD is built, it’s time to put it through its paces. I used a midrange test machine and several different pieces of test benchmarking software (CrystalDisk, ATTO, AS SSD, AJA) to measure how this DRAMless SSD performed.Test Machine:Windows 10 Pro Desktop SystemIntel i5 11400 Rocket Lake – 6-Core 2.6/4.4Ghz16GB DDR4 2666MHz MemoryIntel B560M mATX MotherboardOS Storage, Seagate Firecuda 120 SSDTest SSD connected to Secondary PCIe Gen 4×4 M.2 SlotYou can hear more on how the test was conducted and those results in full in the video below:Using CrystalDisk, we got a good measure of the drive and verified that this PCIe Gen 3 x4 SSD was indeed using the 4×4 lane. Additionally, the temp averaged out around 45 degrees between each test being conducted.Another important area to note whilst the WD Black SN770 SSD was being tested was that the temperature of the controller increased notably during each sustained test. I used a standard $10 m.2 heatsink and even with a 1-minute cool-down between each test, the SSD reached the 60 degrees mark very quickly.The first range of tests were using ATTO Disk benchmark and three separate file sizes were used, 256MB, 1GB and
2025-04-21